Nick Maikousis, South Melbourne president
South Melbourne were approached by Western United for discussions several months ago, which did not end up happening for reasons Maikousis was not clear about.
In the past week, Western United were advised by South Melbourne not to make an announcement about playing their games at Lakeside. They did anyway. South then exercised its legal rights to prevent that from happening. The process of getting a formal response from the Trust is ongoing.
Maikousis noted that Victory and City have also locked out Western United from AAMI Park, and that if fellow A-League teams are not going to look after each other, then its certainly not the place for South Melbourne to look after A-League teams. Also, weren't they supposed to build their own stadium? Isn't this the reason why they got picked over South?
Maikousis noted that Victory and City have also locked out Western United from AAMI Park, and that if fellow A-League teams are not going to look after each other, then its certainly not the place for South Melbourne to look after A-League teams. Also, weren't they supposed to build their own stadium? Isn't this the reason why they got picked over South?
There was also note made that training will resume for our senior men's side tomorrow for the FFA Cup, as that is classed as professional sport.
Chris Pehlivanis, Western United CEO
Attempt at a conciliatory and collegiate tone throughout. Noted that the scheduled (but never held) meeting mentioned above was cancelled due to covid, but was not going to be about using Lakeside; rather it was about establishing good relations with all Victorian clubs. Pehlivanis then set up the framework under which the situation arrived at this point: lack of suitable soccer infrastructure; changed A-League season window; covid, etc.
United were not locked out of AAMI Park because of Victory and City directly, but rather because the trust that operates that venue was concerned about overuse of the pitch due to the A-League season now having more crossover with the NRL and Super Rugby seasons. Also because Victory have moved their allocation of Docklands matches to AAMI Park. At least that's how I understood the situation.
Pehlivanis seemed to also insist that at all times Western United's discussions were conducted with the relevant Trusts for AAMI Park and Lakeside, without any knowledge of what tenancy rights were due to the extant leaseholders.
Alternative venues were not suitable for a variety of reasons: being used by other, primary tenants; resurfacing of turf; covid related seating capacity limits; limited time to implement necessary improvements to venue before start of season, and lack of government support to do that. Pehlivanis contested the claim in a recent Melbourne Knights press release that no stadium audit had taken place for Knights Stadium.
With time running out for Western United to sort out venues before the A-League fixture was released, they then decided to pursue Lakeside as an option. They approached the Trust, and had negotiations with the highest level within that organisation. The stadium audit revealed that Lakeside's lighting needed improvement to adhere to A-League standards (which the Trust was willing to do), and some minor improvements to media facilities. They got approval from the A-League governing body.
A meeting with Nick Maikousis took place, where Maikousis said he'd discuss the matter with the South Melbourne board before providing a formal response. With time running out before the fixture announcement, and before the South board could make a formal response, Western United announced that Lakeside would be one of their venues for the upcoming A-League season.
South have exercised their legal rights to the stadium football veto, and are waiting a response from the Trust. United still intend to play those seven games at Lakeside.
I suppose the wildest angle from this, which others have also noted, is the attempt by Pehlavanis to talk about the Greek and South connections angle at Western United... which I'm sure would have done wonders for all the people (Greek or otherwise) who actually still at South Melbourne, instead of being merely talk and nostalgia.
ReplyDeleteAside from that though, I feel some pity for Pehlavanis in having to try and walk the tightrope last night in making Lakeside sound both acceptable but not too acceptable, after his organisation (even if not he himself), had trashed Lakeside during the bidding process.
Speaking of talk and nostalgia, and this is not a new gripe, not even on this topic - but I have once again had my fill of people who seem to be South supporters going nuts online whenever there's something like this which occurs, but who are nowhere to be found during the season. I'd say they're lucky I don't have access to the club's membership database, but I'm not sure if the club's membership database is in a proper updated and coherent state yet.
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly how I feel. As if it's not enough having an "administration " having yet another clusterfuck we have the "virtual fans" gobbling off about how big this club is ( ha,ha) and the ground belonging to it, yet they can't remember the last time they went there.
Deletewhen was the last time you went? oh the irony in this post LOL
DeleteAnd here I was thinking a measly old earthquake was going to be the highlight of the week :)
ReplyDeleteI too sort of feel bad for Pehlivanis after last nights appearance on 3XY, cant be easy trying to sell ice to native Alaskans I suppose. Wonder where they will try next?
How about Essendon? ;)
DeleteDid I miss the part where Pehlivanis said that the Trust had not informed Western United that South had a veto option over soccer at Lakeside? That they didn't know about the veto is a bit strange, but not impossible. That the Trust didn't tell them at all? That seems pretty dodgy or at the very least careless from the Trust if that's what's happened.
ReplyDelete