Thoughts on the OFC Pro League so far - (Guest post by Manny)

Thanks to Manny of Blue and White Views for offering up this piece. My AGM thing will be up by Thursday.

South have now played five games in the OFC Pro League (OPL) and fans finally have a sense of what the competition is about. With the NPL Victoria season about to start, as well as the Melbourne Circuit of the OPL around the corner, I thought I'd take a second to reflect on South's season so far, and how I think the OPL may impact the club in the short and medium term.

 

South on the pitch at the OPL

 

One of the big questions about the OPL ahead of the competition's launch was regarding the standard of football that it would present. So far, the product on the pitch has probably ranged from NPL Victoria level when the bigger teams are involved, all the way down to a lower VPL2 level when the smaller teams are involved. South certainly hasn't played remarkable football throughout this competition; however the team has largely met expectations and remains the only undefeated team in the competition.

 

The first three games of the competition were due to be played in Auckland, where South kicked off their campaign with a 2-1 win against Tahiti United. South probably looked the better of the two teams on individual quality but were not convincing in their performance, needing a 98th minute free kick from Mesourouni to seal the victory. My read of this first game was that South simply struggled with its many new players and weren't at their best largely due to a lack of chemistry. This was not unexpected so early in the year, however there is real concern about the quality of some of these new recruits.

 

The second game against the Solomon Kings was postponed due to poor weather, but the third game saw South dominate the bottom-of-the-table team, PNG Hekari, 5-0. There wasn't much to read into this game from a South side owing to the opposition's lack of quality, however the game did highlight the importance of the OPL in improving the level of football in Oceania; teams like PNG Hekari will certainly improve over the course of the competition.

 

The next three games of the competition were played in Port Morseby, in extremely hot and humid conditions. As such, pretty much all of the games here saw a slower pace, and fitness was often the deciding factor in matches. South's fourth competition game was a 3-3 draw against South Island United. It was a disappointing result partly reflecting some poor keeping from new signing Shalamanov-Trenkov (who lost his spot for the next two games), but also disappointing due to the lack of on-filed cohesiveness. From a team standpoint though the difficult hot conditions take a little sting out of the performance and buys the team some leniency.

 

South however lose some of that leniency in their fifth game against Bula FC where we secured a 1-1 draw. Despite dominating the play for almost the whole game, Bula managed to look threatening on the counter and once they equalised South looked toothless in front of goal. A lot has been said about squad management recently but this game really underlined our lack of striking options after the departures of Aguek and Lavale to the A-League.

 

In the sixth game of the competition, South stormed home to a 5-2 victory against Vanuatu United in, to be frank, bizarre circumstances. By the end of the game Vanuatu ended with four red cards - three for players and one for their head coach. Also strange was the fact that South scored all five of their goals from set plays. It was a strange game also for the fact that Vanuatu still looked occasionally threatening with nine on the park, even scoring a goal to bring the game back to 3-2 before South sealed the result later in the game.

 

So overall what can we say about South on the pitch? Firstly, the headline results are OK. South is the only undefeated team in the league and finds itself second on the table behind Auckland. It is also true that South's performances have not been convincing. The team has not played the entertaining possession-based football we grew used to at the end of last year's NPL season and has instead built on a direct play style with a heavy reliance on set plays - Mikkola's throws are once again finding the spotlight. Individually as well, a few players are creating cause for concern. New recruits (with the exception of Swibel) have not impressed, specifically new goalkeeper Shalamanov-Trenkov (who has already lost his starting spot) and Coveny (who's erroneous pass gave Vanuatu a cheap goal).

 

I think overall though fans need to give the team some leniency. We need to factor the unfamiliar international travel, the searingly hot conditions in the Port Moresby games, and the challenges in absorbing all the new squad members. Considering the standard of competition and that the first six rounds of the OPL could almost be considered an extended pre-season, the team will need to see improvements.

 

What next on-field?

 

The next lot of games represents a clear step up in competition. The next round of OPL will be held in Melbourne and will see up play ladder leaders Auckland, as well as mid-table teams South Island and Tahiti United. This represents our toughest circuit of the competition. Not that all teams (six of which were formed just for the OPL) have a few games under their belt, I would expect the rest of the OPL to present a higher level of on-field play. Travel and even match-day conditions aren't really an excuse anymore.

 

However we are also about to commence our NPL season with Avondale up first. With the increased competitiveness of the NPL this year (enter George Cross, Bentleigh and Melbourne City) as well as the unconvincing performances of our new OPL recruits I think it is clear we can't compete on both fronts and will need to prioritise one competition, and considering the threat of relegation, I think we need to prioritise the NPL.

 

So what needs to change? Well I think the first thing that needs to change is squad continuity in the NPL. Unlike the OPL where we have seen huge squad and match-day turnover I think we need to see a strong starting XI in the NPL week-in-week-out which can develop chemistry and produce cohesive performance which simply haven't occurred in the OPL. We also need to rethink our attacking play or risk reverting to a set-piece heavy 'Esta-ball-lite' which our OPL performances have teased. This simply won't cut it in an NPL considering the increased physicality of our opponents. Let's consider our best XI (per my thoughts)

 

Lopez

Lampard - Eliopoulos - Jankovic - Painter Andrews

Mikkola - Giannakopoulos - Pasquali - Uchida

Bonada - Swibel

 

Play style wise this squad is more capable than our squad at the end of last year, and chemistry wise we haven't really seen this squad so far in the OPL. That says to me there is upside on what we have seen so far in the OPL but also suggests our pre-season has probably been less than optimal by way of our inability to train as one squad. On our 'pre-season' as far as I am away our results have been underwhelming. The South 'B' team of first team players left in Melbourne and reserve players likely to fill the gaps when the OPL overlaps with the NPL have not impressed our online fans and offers a worrying sign for our ability to compete in both competitions. Overall… even after watching five South games this year I feel like I have no idea what we will serve up against Avondale in round 1!

 

Off-field OPL

 

So… now to the off-field stuff. I think off the bat, FIFA and the OFC have done a fantastic job in the organisation and presentation of this league. The broadcast is exceptional from a production perspective (multiple HD cameras!) and a distribution perspective (FIFA+ has been great for me)! The OPL will improve football in the region as the competition is delivering higher competition to pacific footballers and access to professional governance and training. Commentary, refereeing, VAR, stadia - I could go on. The whole competition is a big thumbs up - of course this is entirely dependent on sustainable funding which about the long term - I believe there is none. (I can't be bothered with this conversation for now….)

 

I'll also add that South's participation is also a huge thumbs up - from the perspective of the OFC. Why? Yes, I think Wellington Phoenix could have (nay probably should have) taken our place, however we need to recognise Australia's importance to the OFC - and heck even New Zealand specifically. Economically, politically, and socially Australia is critical to the Pacific (it's one of the reasons I believe South have been able to secure federal funds to participate in this comp) but from a football perspective Australia is to the Pacific what Europe is to Australia. The most realistic next step for elite Pacific footballers, coaches and referees is the A-League or even the NPL. Australia also represents the largest nationality represented in the competition, not via South, but via other clubs who have called on Australian coaches and players. South offers a critical bridge between the Pacific and its largest football opportunity and already we've seen the Australian football community, (let's be honest, largely through South) pay attention to this competition - maybe not a broad basis but outlets like Football360, Round Ball Australia and communities on Green and Gold FC, and Reddit.

 

Now, finally from a South perspective, the OPL is a huge platform for the club. The South brand is being shared across the Pacific, and the club can do international community work (as we saw them at a PNG school) and offer players and staff professional experiences in the form of travel, match-day experience and broadcast media. However, these benefits are completely contingent on external Funding either via the Federal government (which may not be available in the long term) or FIFA (who don't want to fund an AFC based team). These benefits must also be balanced with the practical challenges of overlapping competitions. We will only know at the conclusion of this season how the OPL will impact our NPL season and vice-versa, but it is clear squad management, logistics, fan experience and even competition integrity are under pressure. The jury is out on this one.

 

A few thoughts.

 

I think that in the long run the OPL will have to be relegated to a reserve’s competition for us, unless there is some sort of unprecedented pickup in economic benefits or fan interest of which I see no real chance for either. I know this thought is a little blunt, and maybe not to ambitious but I'm a simple guy and I like simple answers.

 

I think this will align with Auckland's approach and allow us to clearly define what the OPL is (development) and what NPL is (priority) which benefits to fans, the club, and the individual leagues. So, let's say we take the Auckland approach - this will require a change in our registration rules but essentially, we would play our reserves in the OPL with an allowable of three first team squad members each game. We can also bolster this squad with OPL specific signings which I think we need to be more targeted with in the long term. Specifically, I think the OPL is a great opportunity for the club to recognise Australian Indigenous cultures and provide footballing opportunities to first Australians. However, as I alluded to earlier, the jury is still out on all of this and maybe the OPL looks different next year!

 

In conclusion

 

Geez, it's been a crazy month already… and we haven't even started the NPL yet!